New York State Court of Claims |
|
Your query court returned 50 results.
 |
August 16, 2017 | 2017-041-057 : ANDERSON v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-041-057, Claim No. 122301, Motion No. M-90491 M-90491 Claim is dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to CPLR 3216. |
 |
August 16, 2017 | 2017-041-056 : MERRITT v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-041-056, Claim No. NONE, Motion No. M-90387 M-90387 Application to file late medical malpractice claim is denied where, pursuant to Court of Claims Act 10 (6), |
 |
August 15, 2017 | 2017-045-508 : SOUMARE v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-045-508, Claim No. 127259 |
|
August 14, 2017 | 2017-041-509 : SABUNCU v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-041-509, Claim No. 123615 Claim alleging that defendant failed to timely respond to an inmate-on-inmate assault is dismissed after trial where claimant failed to prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that defendant responded to the assault in a negligently delayed manner. |
 |
August 9, 2017 | 2017-040-108 : ALPERT v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-108, Claim No. NONE, Motion No. M-90315 M-90315 Motion for permission to serve and file a Claim late granted. |
|
August 9, 2017 | 2017-045-035 : BROWN v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-045-035, Claim No. 129583, Motion No. M-90363 M-90363 Defendant's motion to dismiss pro se inmate claim for assault. Claim served four years after incident. |
 |
August 9, 2017 | 2017-040-107 : SMITH v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-107, Claim No. 129530, Motion No. M-90399 M-90399 State's Motion to dismiss on basis that Claimant failed to comply with the service and timeliness requirements of CCA §§ 10(3) & 11 granted. |
|
August 9, 2017 | 2017-040-110 : HALL v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-110, Claim No. 128482, Motion No. M-90317 M-90317 State's Motion to Dismiss on the basis the Claim was untimely served upon Defendant granted. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-092 : AMAKER v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-092, Claim No. 128414, Motion No. M-90364 M-90364 Claimant's Motion to compel discovery responses pursuant to CPLR 3124 denied. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-106 : WILLIAMS v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-106, Claim No. NONE, Motion No. M-90442 M-90442 Motion for permission to serve and file a Claim late granted in part. |
 |
August 8, 2017 | 2017-015-251 : BROWN v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-015-251, Claim No. 124387, Motion No. M-90543 M-90543 Pro se inmate's motion for the production of documents and witnesses was denied except to the limited extent of requiring the production of certain documents at trial. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-105 : JOHNSON v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-105, Claim No. 117986 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-104 : HINES v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-104, Claim No. 118530 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-103 : GIBSON v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-103, Claim No. 118274 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-102 : DANIEL v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-102, Claim No. 117086 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-101 : FERNANDEZ v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-101, Claim No. 111681 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-100 : ALARCON v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-100, Claim No. 122076 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-099 : PICHARDO v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-099, Claim No. 116352 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-098 : NELSON v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-098, Claim No. 115699 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-097 : SNYPE v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-097, Claim No. 115639 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-096 : MURRAY v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-096, Claim No. 111328 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-095 : URENA v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-095, Claim No. 119990 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-094 : MORRIS v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-094, Claim No. 120759 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 8, 2017 | 2017-040-093 : NELSON v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-093, Claim No. 119001 Pro se Claimant failed to appear for Trial. Court granted State's Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. |
|
August 7, 2017 | 2017-045-034 : SKATES v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-045-034, Claim No. 125434, Motion No. M-90379 M-90379 Defendant's motion to dismiss pro se inmate claim alleging, inter alia, religious violations. |
|
July 28, 2017 | 2017-053-541 : ME & MORGAN, LLC v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-053-541, Claim No. 121521, Motion No. M-89720 M-89720 In this appropriations claim, defendant's motion to compel responses to interrogatories and document demands is granted as more of the responses requested are palpably improper. |
|
July 27, 2017 | 2017-041-052 : SPRINKLER v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-041-052, Claim No. 129586, Motion No. M-90390 M-90390 Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted on ground that claim was served more than ninety days after accrual. |
|
July 26, 2017 | 2017-015-254 : SANTIAGO v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-015-254, Claim No. 120884, Motion No. M-90612 M-90612 Claim was dismissed for lack of service. |
|
July 26, 2017 | 2017-015-252 : FRYE v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-015-252, Claim No. 123333, Motion No. M-90610 M-90610 Defendant's dismissal motion was granted for lack of service of the claim. |
|
July 26, 2017 | 2017-015-255 : POWELL v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-015-255, Claim No. 124105, Motion No. M-90611 M-90611 Claim was dismissed for lack of service. |
|
July 25, 2017 | 2017-041-052 : ROBINSON v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-041-052, Claim No. 128325, Motion No. M-90332 M-90332 Defendant's motion to dismiss the claim and amended claim is granted where claim failed to comply with the pleading requirements of CPLR 3014 and where claimant failed to timely file and serve amended claim as directed by Court's prior Decision and Order. |
|
July 24, 2017 | 2017-041-051 : HENRY v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-041-051, Claim No. 120014, Motion No. M-90396 M-90396 Claim alleging that defendant denied the inmate/claimant |
|
July 20, 2017 | 2017-053-538 : SPARKS v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-053-538, Claim No. 124904, Motion No. M-90494 M-90494 Claimant's motion seeking permission to amend the notice of intention and claim to assert an additional cause of action or in the alternative, seeking leave to late file a claim is denied. |
|
July 19, 2017 | 2017-041-049 : ELIAS v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-041-049, Claim No. 121759, Motion No. M-90406 M-90406 Motion to dismiss claim alleging assault and medical malpractice is granted where assault cause of action was not served within time period set forth in Court of Claims Act 10 (3-b) and where medical malpractice cause of action fails to comply with pleading requirements of Court of Claims Act 11 (b). |
|
July 19, 2017 | 2017-040-091 : MALIK, ROGERS v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-091, Claim No. 124841 Claim dismissed based upon Claimant's failure to appear at Trial. |
|
July 18, 2017 | 2017-053-539 : BARNETT v. THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, # 2017-053-539, Claim No. 127394, Motion No. M-89846, Cross-Motion No. CM-89893 M-89846 Claimant's motion to amend the claim to correct the date of the occurrence is denied. Original claim is jurisdictionally defective for failing to state the correct date. Defendant's cross-motion to dismiss is granted. Claimant's recourse is to file a motion for permission to file a late claim to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6). |
|
July 17, 2017 | 2017-038-551 : EDWARDS v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-038-551, Claim No. 123656, Motion Nos. M-90213, M-90274 M-90213, M-90274 Defendant's motion for protective order granted, disclosure of correctional facility Personal Alarm System Manual would compromise correctional security, at the facility and statewide. Claimant's motion for production of documents and items denied in the absence of proof that any relevant discovery request had been made by claimant. |
|
July 14, 2017 | 2017-040-088 : CARGILL v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-088, Claim No. 129337, Motion No. M-90352 M-90352 Pro se Claimant's Motion to strike State's Answer and for summary judgment denied. |
|
July 14, 2017 | 2017-040-090 : RAMOS v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-090, Claim No. 114863 Court finds that Claimant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant was negligent in connection with his fall on a snowy walkway at a correctional facility. |
|
July 14, 2017 | 2017-040-089 : TORRES v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-089, Claim No. 127500, Motion No. M-90288 M-90288 Motion to Amend Claim denied as Claimant failed to comply with CPLR 3025(b). |
|
July 11, 2017 | 2017-015-250 : ROMANO v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-015-250, Claim No. 123742, Motion No. M-90603 M-90603 Claim was dismissed for failure to serve the claim on the Office of the Attorney General. |
|
July 10, 2017 | 2017-040-087 : BALLARD v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-087, Claim No. NONE, Motion No. M-90257 M-90257 Pro se Movant's Motion for permission to file a late Claim pursuant to CCA § 10(6) denied as no proposed Claim accompanied motion papers as required. |
|
July 10, 2017 | 2017-041-048 : MICHEL v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-041-048, Claim No. NONE, Motion No. M-90240 M-90240 Application to file late claim is granted in part and denied in part as allegations provide cause to believe a valid cause of action for wrongful confinement may exist. |
|
July 7, 2017 | 2017-045-027 : DAVIS v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-045-027, Claim No. 126518, Motion No. M-89398 M-89398 Claimant's motion for an order striking defendant's second demand for document production. |
|
July 7, 2017 | 2017-040-086 : FRAISER v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-086, Claim No. 129388, Motion No. M-90509 M-90509 Pro se Claimant's Motion for poor person status and assignment of counsel denied. |
|
July 7, 2017 | 2017-040-082 : GREENE v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-082, Claim No. NONE, Motion No. M-90369 M-90369 Pro se Movant's Court o Claims Act § 10(6) Motion for permission to serve and file a late Claim denied without prejudice. |
|
July 7, 2017 | 2017-015-248 : GREEN v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-015-248, Claim No. 127056, Motion No. M-90382 M-90382 Claimant's motion to settle the record on appeal was denied because he failed to submit a copy of the proposed record on appeal. |
|
July 7, 2017 | 2017-015-247 : BYRD v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-015-247, Claim No. 123243, Motion No. M-90585 M-90585 Claimant's motion for summary judgment and the issuance of trial subpoenas relating to the upcoming trial of his bailment claim was denied. |
|
July 7, 2017 | 2017-040-083 : JOHNS v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-040-083, Claim No. 127051, Motion No. M-90120, Cross-Motion No. CM-90290 M-90120 Claimant's Motion for Summary Judgment denied and State's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing the Claim granted. |
|
July 7, 2017 | 2017-038-549 : MARTIRANO v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2017-038-549, Claim No. 124393, Motion No. M-89622 M-89622 Defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing claim containing causes of action pursuant to Labor Law § 200 (1) and Labor Law § 241 (6) granted. Defendant demonstrated its lack of authority to supervise or control the injury-producing work, and that there was not a violation of a provision of the Industrial Code or that any such violation was a proximate cause of claimant's injury, and claimant did not raise a triable issue of material fact in opposition to the motion. |