Pro se Claimant's Motion for poor person status and assignment of counsel denied.
|Claimant short name:||BENNETT|
|Footnote (claimant name) :||Caption amended to reflect Claimant's name only.|
|Defendant(s):||THE STATE OF NEW YORK|
|Footnote (defendant name) :|
|Judge:||CHRISTOPHER J. McCARTHY|
|Claimant's attorney:||Anthony Bennett, Pro Se|
|Defendant's attorney:||LETITIA JAMES
Attorney General of the State of New York
By: Albert DiGiacomo, Esq., AAG
|Third-party defendant's attorney:|
|Signature date:||June 16, 2021|
|See also (multicaptioned case)|
For the reasons set forth below, Claimant's Motion seeking poor person status and assignment of counsel pursuant to CPLR §§ 1101 and 1102(a) is denied.
This pro se Claim was filed in the office of the Clerk of the Court on August 27, 2020 and alleges that, on September 18, 2019, Defendant breached a contract for employment with Claimant, took away his job and associated wages, and denied him due process.
Attached to the Claim is an Affidavit in Support of an Application pursuant to CPLR § 1101(d) to reduce the amount of the Court of Claims filing fee. By Order filed October 22, 2020, Acting Presiding Judge Richard E. Sise waived Claimant's filing fee pursuant to CPLR § 1101(d). Claimant now seeks leave to proceed as a poor person and for assignment of counsel.
Pursuant to CPLR § 1101(c), if an action has been commenced, notice of a poor person motion shall be served on all parties and shall also be given to the county attorney in the county in which the action is triable. Notice to the county attorney is a significant requirement because certain costs may be a county charge (see CPLR 1102; Hines v State of New York, UID No. 2005-028-534 [Ct Cl, Sise, P.J., June 21, 2005]; Jabbar v State of New York, UID No. 2006-044-504 [Ct Cl, Schaewe, J., Oct. 20, 2006]). The action is triable in the county where the claim accrued, in this case, Oneida County, since that is where the alleged acts occurred. Claimant has failed to establish that he served a copy of this Motion upon the Oneida County Attorney. Thus, pursuant to CPLR § 1101(c), his Motion is defective and must be denied on those grounds (Sebastiano v State of New York, 92 AD2d 966 [3d Dept 1983]; Harris v State of New York, 100 Misc 2d 1015, 1016 [Ct Cl 1979]).
Further, even assuming compliance with CPLR § 1101(c), the Motion would still be denied. The assignment of counsel in civil matters is discretionary and is generally denied except in cases involving loss of liberty or grievous forfeiture (Matter of Smiley, 36 NY2d 433 ; Wills v City of Troy, 258 AD2d 849 [3d Dept 1999], lv dismissed 93 NY2d 1000 ; Brabham v State of New York, 13 Misc 3d 1222[A] [Ct Cl 2006]; Hines v State of New York, supra; Jabbar v State of New York, supra). Here, Claimant has failed to establish that the Claim is of sufficient complexity or that it involves such fundamental rights that the Court would be justified in exercising its discretion to appoint an attorney to appear without compensation (see Matter of Smiley, supra; Wills v City of Troy, supra).
Therefore, based upon the foregoing, Claimant's request to be granted poor person status and assignment of counsel is denied.
June 16, 2021
Albany, New York
CHRISTOPHER J. McCARTHY
Judge of the Court of Claims
The following papers were read and considered by the Court on Claimant's Motion seeking
poor person status and assignment of counsel pursuant to CPLR §§ 1101 and 1102(a):
Notice of Motion, Affidavit in Support 1
Filed Papers: Claim, Answer